September 11, 2025

THE CLIFF NEWS

National Daily Bilingual Newspaper

Category: International

PSG Thrash Atletico Madrid 4-0 to Open Club World Cup Campaign in Style

Paris Saint-Germain (PSG) began their Club World Cup journey with an emphatic 4-0 win over Spanish giants Atletico Madrid at a packed Rose Bowl in Pasadena, California, on Sunday. The Champions League holders delivered a commanding performance in their first competitive outing since defeating Inter Milan 5-0 in the European final last month. Fabian Ruiz opened the scoring in the 19th minute with a stunning long-range strike, setting the tone for the French side. As Atletico Madrid struggled to find rhythm, PSG doubled their lead just before half-time through Vitinha, capitalising on a quick counter-attack that followed an Antoine Griezmann miss. Atletico briefly celebrated a potential comeback after Julian Alvarez found the back of the net in the 57th minute, but VAR disallowed the goal due to a foul by Koke on Desire Doue. The decision prompted a sarcastic reaction from Atletico coach Diego Simeone on the sidelines. Matters worsened for the LaLiga club when Clement Lenglet was sent off after receiving a second yellow card. Alexander Sorloth then missed a golden chance to score, firing over an open goal from close range. Late in the match, Senny Mayulu netted PSG’s third in the 87th minute, and Lee Kang-in sealed the victory with a penalty in stoppage time. Despite the absence of Ousmane Dembele, who is sidelined with injury, PSG dominated with 74% possession and 11 shots on target, while Atletico managed just one. Vitinha, named Man of the Match, praised his team’s consistency: “The hardest thing to do in football is to maintain the level. That’s what I tried to do. Very good performance by the team and a very good start to this competition.” The match, witnessed by a crowd of 80,000, showcased growing enthusiasm for football in the U.S., just a year ahead of the 2026 World Cup, which will be co-hosted by the USA, Mexico, and Canada. Next Fixtures:

Read More
Editor03 mins

प्रधानमंत्री मोदी का साइप्रस दौरा: भारत जल्द बनेगा विश्व की तीसरी सबसे बड़ी अर्थव्यवस्था, निवेशकों को दिया आमंत्रण

प्रधानमंत्री नरेंद्र मोदी ने साइप्रस के लिमासोल में आयोजित India-Cyprus CEO Forum को संबोधित करते हुए भारत की तेज़ आर्थिक प्रगति, स्थिर नीतियों और डिजिटल क्रांति को रेखांकित किया। यह दौरा किसी भारतीय प्रधानमंत्री का बीते 23 वर्षों में पहला साइप्रस दौरा है, और इसकी शुरुआत आर्थिक मंच से होने को प्रधानमंत्री ने रिश्तों में आर्थिक सहयोग की अहमियत बताया। भारत: दुनिया की तीसरी सबसे बड़ी अर्थव्यवस्था की ओर प्रधानमंत्री मोदी ने कहा कि भारत आज दुनिया की पाँचवीं सबसे बड़ी अर्थव्यवस्था बन चुका है और निकट भविष्य में यह तीसरी सबसे बड़ी अर्थव्यवस्था बनने की राह पर है। “बीते एक दशक में भारत आर्थिक दृष्टि से बेहद तेज़ी से बढ़ा है। आज भारत स्पष्ट और स्थिर नीति के साथ आगे बढ़ रहा है।” व्यापार और निवेश को लेकर बड़े सुधार मोदी ने कहा कि उनकी सरकार ने एक राष्ट्र, एक कर नीति (GST), कॉर्पोरेट टैक्स में बदलाव, और हज़ारों पुराने कानूनों को अपराधमुक्त (decriminalised) कर व्यापारिक माहौल को सरल बनाया है। साथ ही, ईज ऑफ डूइंग बिजनेस और ट्रस्ट ऑफ डूइंग बिजनेस को बढ़ावा दिया गया है। डिजिटल क्रांति और UPI की ताकत प्रधानमंत्री ने भारत में हुई डिजिटल क्रांति पर प्रकाश डाला और बताया कि विश्व के 50% डिजिटल ट्रांज़ैक्शन भारत में UPI (यूनिफाइड पेमेंट्स इंटरफेस) के माध्यम से होते हैं। उन्होंने साइप्रस को भी UPI नेटवर्क से जोड़ने की पेशकश की, जैसा कि फ्रांस जैसे देश कर चुके हैं। नवाचार और स्टार्टअप भारत की नई पहचान “भारत में 1 लाख से अधिक स्टार्टअप हैं, जिनमें सैकड़ों यूनिकॉर्न हैं। ये केवल सपने नहीं, समाधान बेचते हैं।” मोदी ने बताया कि भारत में नवाचार अब आर्थिक शक्ति का स्तंभ बन चुका है। मेक इन इंडिया और मैन्युफैक्चरिंग मिशन प्रधानमंत्री ने भारत के Manufacturing Mission का उल्लेख करते हुए बताया कि भारत इलेक्ट्रॉनिक्स, आईटी, सेमीकंडक्टर, बायोटेक और ग्रीन डेवलपमेंट के क्षेत्रों में वैश्विक केंद्र बनने की ओर अग्रसर है। “हम हर वर्ष 100 अरब डॉलर से अधिक का निवेश भविष्य की अधोसंरचना में कर रहे हैं। पोर्ट और मरीन विकास, शिपबिल्डिंग, एविएशन — सभी तेजी से आगे बढ़ रहे हैं।” हरित विकास और ऊर्जा लक्ष्यों की ओर बढ़ता भारत भारत 2030 तक 500 गीगावाट रिन्यूएबल एनर्जी के लक्ष्य की ओर तेज़ी से बढ़ रहा है। रेलवे को 100% कार्बन न्यूट्रल बनाने और ग्रीन शिपिंग को बढ़ावा देने के लिए प्रयास जारी हैं। AI, Quantum, Critical Minerals और Nuclear Power Missions को भारत के नए विकास इंजन बताया गया। भारत-साइप्रस व्यापार संबंधों की नई संभावनाएं प्रधानमंत्री ने कहा कि वर्तमान में भारत-साइप्रस के बीच 150 मिलियन डॉलर का व्यापार है, लेकिन दोनों देशों के रिश्तों की संभावनाएं इससे कहीं अधिक हैं। उन्होंने साइप्रस को यूरोप के लिए एक द्वार मानते हुए भारतीय कंपनियों के सहयोग की सराहना की। निवेशकों को भारत आने का आमंत्रण प्रधानमंत्री मोदी ने भारत के नीति माहौल, विशाल बाज़ार और युवा प्रतिभा का हवाला देते हुए साइप्रस और यूरोपीय निवेशकों को भारत में को-डेवलप, को-डिज़ाइन और को-प्रोड्यूस करने का आमंत्रण दिया। निष्कर्ष:प्रधानमंत्री मोदी का यह ऐतिहासिक दौरा भारत और साइप्रस के आर्थिक रिश्तों को नई गति देने वाला है। भारत की वैश्विक आर्थिक ताकत, डिजिटल क्षमताएं और नवाचार का विस्तार निवेशकों के लिए एक अद्भुत अवसर बन रहा है — और मोदी सरकार इसे एक वैश्विक साझेदारी में बदलने के लिए पूरी तरह तैयार है।

Read More
Editor01 mins

IDF Apologises for Map Showing J&K as Part of Pakistan; Sparks Political Row in India Amid Israel-Iran Escalation

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has issued a public apology after posting a map on social media that incorrectly depicted Jammu and Kashmir as part of Pakistan. The error sparked a wave of criticism, particularly from Indian users who flooded the IDF’s X (formerly Twitter) handle demanding the post be retracted. Acknowledging the mistake, the IDF stated: “This post is an illustration of the region. This map fails to precisely depict borders. We apologize for any offence caused by this image.” However, the clarification did little to quell political controversy in India. The Indian National Congress seized the moment to criticize Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his foreign policy strategy. Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera posted on X, “Another day, another feather in Vishwaguru’s cap. His ‘friend’ shows Jammu & Kashmir as a part of Pakistan.” The post was seen as a diplomatic embarrassment, particularly given the close ties shared between PM Modi and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Modi became the first Indian PM to visit Israel in 2017, marking a shift in Indo-Israeli relations with increased public displays of friendship and strategic cooperation. Rising Tensions: Israel-Iran Conflict Escalates Meanwhile, the diplomatic row coincides with a dangerous flare-up in the Middle East. Iran launched another wave of missile strikes on northern Israel early Saturday morning, triggering air-raid sirens and forcing civilians into shelters. This followed an earlier Iranian retaliation where over 100 drones were deployed in response to deadly overnight Israeli airstrikes that targeted Iranian soil under “Operation Rising Lion.” Among the casualties was Hossein Salami, the chief of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, as reported by local media. The conflict has now evolved into a full-blown military escalation between the two regional powers, raising global concerns about wider instability in the Middle East. As both diplomatic and military tensions surge, the incident involving the IDF’s map serves as a reminder of how sensitive geopolitical borders remain — especially when amplified on the global stage through social media.

Read More
Editor03 mins

Iran-Israel Conflict Poses Major Economic Threats for India Amid Oil Price Surge and Trade Disruptions

The escalating conflict between Israel and Iran has sparked serious concerns for India’s economy, with analysts warning of a surge in oil import costs and significant disruptions to export routes. The situation worsened after Israel launched strikes on multiple Iranian nuclear and military sites early on Friday, June 13, prompting retaliatory drone attacks from Iran. Global oil prices surged by nearly 8% in just one day following the strikes, fueling fears of inflationary pressure in India, which imports over 80% of its crude oil requirements. Although India currently imports only minimal oil from Iran due to U.S. sanctions, the ripple effects of the conflict are expected to be far-reaching. Amit Kumar, Partner and Energy & Renewables Industry Leader at Grant Thornton Bharat, told that any disruption around the Strait of Hormuz—a critical chokepoint through which 20% of the world’s oil supply flows—could severely affect shipments from key Indian suppliers like Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE. “The ongoing Iran-Israel conflict is likely to pose risks to oil supply… even if direct imports from Iran are minimal, global price spikes due to conflict will raise crude oil import costs,” Kumar said. Trade experts also warn that the conflict could affect India’s export logistics. Pankaj Chadha, Chairman of the Engineering Exports Promotion Council of India, highlighted that tension in the Middle East could limit access to the Suez Canal and Red Sea shipping routes. “With the Suez route compromised, ships will have to reroute via the Cape of Good Hope, adding 15–20 days of travel time and increasing shipping costs by $500–$1,000 per container. This effectively means a 40–50% hike in export costs,” Chadha explained. Despite the initial spike in oil prices, some analysts believe the market may stabilize. Norbert Rücker, Head of Economics at Julius Baer, said, “This latest conflict eruption follows the usual pattern, with prices rising temporarily before returning to previous levels. The oil market remains resilient, with sufficient storage and spare capacity.” Meanwhile, the price of gold has also spiked, crossing ₹1 lakh per 10 grams, as investors seek safer assets amidst global turmoil. Amit Jain, co-founder of Ashika Global Family Office Services, noted this trend is not merely short-term. “In times of conflict and uncertainty, gold remains the go-to hedge… This is part of a broader uptrend fueled by central bank gold buying, weakening confidence in fiat currencies, and long-term inflation concerns,” he said. As tensions in the Middle East continue, India faces a dual challenge of managing rising import costs and safeguarding its export economy, all while maintaining macroeconomic stability.

Read More
Editor04 mins

India Moves to Curb Rare Earth Exports to Japan Amid Growing Need to Counter China’s Dominance

In a strategic policy shift aimed at reducing dependency on China and boosting domestic capabilities, the Indian government has asked its state-run miner, IREL (India) Limited, to suspend a 13-year-old agreement that facilitates rare earth exports to Japan, according to sources cited. The directive comes at a time when global trade tensions over critical minerals, especially rare earth elements, are intensifying. Rare Earths and National Strategy IREL has been supplying rare earth materials—primarily neodymium, crucial for making magnets used in electric vehicle motors—to Toyotsu Rare Earths India, a subsidiary of Japan’s Toyota Tsusho. These materials are then processed and exported to Japan. In 2024 alone, Toyotsu shipped over 1,000 metric tons of rare earths to Japan, which accounted for nearly one-third of IREL’s total output of 2,900 tons. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal, in a recent meeting with industry executives, emphasized the importance of safeguarding India’s rare earth supplies for domestic industries. The focus is now shifting toward building indigenous rare earth processing capacity, a field currently dominated by China, which has been using its control over the global rare earth supply chain as a geopolitical lever. China’s Influence and India’s Response China’s decision to curb rare earth exports since April 2025 has placed pressure on the global tech and auto industries, leading countries like India to reassess their own export policies. The fear of supply chain disruptions has revived memories of China’s 2010 rare earth export halt to Japan, which had earlier prompted Japan to partner with India for alternative supplies. India holds the fifth-largest reserves of rare earths in the world, with approximately 6.9 million metric tons, yet lacks facilities to manufacture magnets from them. As a result, the country continues to import finished rare earth magnets, mainly from China. In FY25, India imported over 53,700 metric tons of these magnets for use in automobiles, wind turbines, medical equipment, and other high-tech applications. Future Outlook and Diplomatic Considerations Although the Indian government is keen on suspending the existing export arrangement, the move may not be immediate due to its foundation in a bilateral agreement between India and Japan signed in 2012. Sources indicate that IREL prefers an amicable resolution, given Japan’s status as a key strategic partner. Meanwhile, IREL is awaiting statutory clearances for four new mining sites, indicating its intent to scale up domestic production and processing capabilities. The government is expected to push for accelerated development of a rare earth-to-magnet value chain within the country. Japan’s Trade Ministry refrained from commenting on the developments, citing a general policy of not discussing bilateral exchanges publicly. Conclusion As global supply chains grow more volatile amid geopolitical tensions, India’s decision to prioritize its rare earth reserves for domestic use signals a clear shift toward self-reliance and strategic autonomy. While it could temporarily affect Japanese manufacturers, it also reflects a broader realignment in critical mineral policies worldwide, driven by the growing urgency to counterbalance China’s global resource dominance.

Read More
Editor05 mins

Massive Fire on Singapore-Flagged Ship Off Kerala Coast: 4 Still Missing, Rescue Ops Continue

A major fire has engulfed a Singapore-flagged container vessel approximately 70 nautical miles off the coast of Beypore in Kozhikode, Kerala. Despite relentless firefighting efforts, the blaze has remained uncontrollable for over 58 hours, raising concerns about the safety of the crew and potential environmental damage. Indian Navy’s Swift Rescue Operation The Indian Navy has rescued 18 crew members from the burning vessel and transported them to Mangaluru for medical treatment and care. A massive search and rescue operation is still underway to locate four missing crew members. Injuries and Hospitalization Among the injured are two foreign nationals—Chinese national Lu Yanli and Indonesian national Sonitur Haeni—who suffered serious burn injuries. Both are currently being treated in the emergency intensive care unit (ICU) of a private hospital in Mangaluru. Doctors have stated that their condition is stable, but they are expected to remain under close observation in the ICU for the next four to five days. Four other crew members sustained minor injuries, and one among them was discharged from the hospital on Wednesday, hospital authorities confirmed. Crew Composition and International Response The ill-fated vessel had a total of 22 crew members on board, including 14 Chinese nationals. In response to the incident, the Chinese Embassy has expressed its sincere gratitude to the Indian Navy for its prompt and courageous rescue operation. Embassy officials also extended wishes for the speedy recovery of the injured personnel and a successful conclusion to the firefighting and search efforts. Ongoing Operations The Indian Navy and Coast Guard remain engaged in firefighting and recovery efforts, while aerial and surface surveillance continues to track the situation and locate the missing sailors. Authorities are also monitoring the vessel for any signs of potential oil leakage or further structural damage. As the situation remains tense, maritime authorities are coordinating closely with international agencies to ensure all safety and environmental protocols are followed.

Read More
Editor03 mins

US on High Alert Amid Fears of Unilateral Israeli Strike on Iran’s Nuclear Facilities

The United States is reportedly on heightened alert over escalating concerns that Israel may carry out a unilateral strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities, especially if ongoing nuclear negotiations between Washington and Tehran collapse. According to a report, the Trump administration is worried that such a strike could occur without prior US consent, potentially plunging the already fragile Middle East into deeper chaos. Trump Moves to Protect US Personnel Amid these rising tensions, President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that he would begin relocating US personnel out of volatile parts of the Middle East, particularly Iran, citing security risks. “It could be a dangerous place,” Trump said, emphasizing the unpredictability of the situation. The US State Department has approved the voluntary departure of personnel from Iraq, while the Pentagon is allowing military families to leave American bases across the region. Nuclear Talks at a Crossroads The increased security measures coincide with President Trump’s growing pessimism over reaching a new nuclear agreement with Iran. The president reiterated his hardline stance, stating unequivocally, “They can’t have a nuclear weapon. Very simple, they can’t have a nuclear weapon.” Efforts to revive a nuclear deal have stalled, and Trump has voiced frustration with Tehran’s refusal to halt uranium enrichment — a key US demand. Israel Signals Readiness to Strike Concerns intensified after Axios reported last month that Israel is preparing for a rapid military strike on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure if talks fail. Citing sources close to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (nicknamed “Bibi”), the report claimed that Netanyahu is waiting for the moment when US-Israel alignment makes such a strike feasible. Trump has also threatened military action against Iran if negotiations break down. However, US intelligence officials are increasingly concerned that Israel may act independently, a move that could trigger Iranian retaliation and undermine Washington’s diplomatic efforts. Tehran Issues Direct Warning Iran has made it clear that it views any Israeli attack as a direct provocation by the United States, given Washington’s close support for Tel Aviv. On Wednesday, Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh warned that any strike on Iran would provoke a response against US bases in the region, raising the stakes for American personnel and assets. Global Embassies on Alert In response to the rising threat level, the US has ordered embassies within potential Iranian strike range — including those in the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and North Africa — to activate emergency action committees and report back with risk mitigation plans. Voluntary departures from Bahrain and Kuwait have also been approved. As a precautionary measure, Secretary of State Marco Rubio updated the US global travel advisory, stating: “On June 11, the Department of State ordered the departure of non-emergency U.S. government personnel due to heightened regional tensions.” With both Israel and Iran digging in and US diplomacy at a critical juncture, the possibility of a sudden escalation looms large. All eyes remain on the next steps from Tel Aviv, Tehran, and Washington.

Read More
Editor05 mins

India-US Trade Talks Enter Final Stretch Amid Standoff Over Dairy, Agriculture, and Tariffs

India and the United States are in the final phase of negotiating a long-awaited trade agreement, but talks remain tense as both sides grapple with sensitive sectors like dairy, agriculture, digital trade, and medical services. According to insiders, Washington is pressing for greater market access in these areas, while New Delhi is resisting, seeking a balanced agreement that protects its vulnerable sectors. A high-level U.S. delegation, led by Brendan Lynch, Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for South and Central Asia, held extensive talks in New Delhi from June 4 to June 10. While half of the team has returned to the U.S., key negotiators remain in India, pushing for firm commitments. Agriculture and Dairy: Core Flashpoints Former Indian WTO Ambassador Jayant Dasgupta, in an interview with CNBC-TV18, highlighted India’s firm stance against the entry of common U.S. dairy products, citing cultural and market sensitivities. Only niche or “sophisticated” items like certain cheeses, with limited domestic demand, may be considered for import. India also maintains a strict ban on genetically modified (GM) crops, a major sticking point. However, non-GM products with appropriate certification might be allowed. Items such as corn and soybeans, staples in U.S. exports, are still expected to carry high import duties, unless the U.S. agrees to a tariff rate quota (TRQ) system that caps volumes at reduced tariff rates. India’s “Zero-for-Zero” Tariff Demand New Delhi is pushing for a “zero-for-zero” agreement, eliminating tariffs on both sides. But the U.S. is reluctant, reportedly seeking to maintain a 10% tariff on Indian goods. Dasgupta argues that even this reduced duty could work in India’s favour, especially if rival exporters like China and Vietnam continue facing steeper tariffs in the U.S. Trade Pact Timeline India has proposed a three-stage roadmap to finalise the trade agreement: However, Dasgupta cautioned that a complete rollback to pre-Trump tariff levels is unlikely, though moderate reductions may be achievable. Clock Ticking on Reciprocal Tariffs The negotiations are under added pressure due to the 26% retaliatory tariff the U.S. imposed on Indian goods on April 2, which has been temporarily suspended for 90 days, expiring July 9. India is pushing for a full exemption from this duty and is hoping to clinch an early harvest deal to stabilise trade relations and boost investor confidence. As Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal leads parallel discussions in Washington, both nations are striving to bridge differences. The outcome of these talks will be crucial not just for resolving trade tensions but for shaping the future of India-US strategic economic ties in an increasingly volatile global landscape.

Read More
Editor05 mins

Elon Musk Expresses Regret Over Attacks on Trump Amid Escalating Feud

In a surprising turn, Elon Musk on Wednesday expressed regret over his recent social media outbursts targeting U.S. President Donald Trump, admitting that his posts “went too far.” In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Musk wrote, “I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far.” The apology comes after a week-long public spat between the tech billionaire and the President, which captured massive attention online. The conflict began when Musk heavily criticized Trump’s sweeping tax and spending proposal—dubbed the “One Big Beautiful Bill” (OBBB)—calling it a “disgusting abomination” that would saddle Americans with unsustainable debt, potentially adding $3 trillion to the national deficit. Musk, who had previously endorsed Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign and reportedly spent $288 million in support, also appeared alongside the President at several campaign events. Trump, in turn, named Musk to lead a task force aimed at downsizing the federal workforce and slashing government spending. However, tensions flared after Musk stepped down from his advisory role and openly denounced the OBBB. Trump retaliated, claiming, “Elon was wearing thin. I asked him to leave […] and he just went CRAZY!” The feud escalated when Musk called for Trump’s impeachment and tweeted unverified allegations linking Trump to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal—posts that he has since deleted. While Musk’s deletion of several inflammatory tweets suggested an attempt to de-escalate the situation, Trump showed no sign of backing down. Posting on Truth Social, Trump warned Musk of “very serious consequences” if he chose to support Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections. Trump also took aim at Musk’s businesses, threatening to cut off federal subsidies and contracts. “The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,” Trump wrote. “I was always surprised that Biden didn’t do it.” Despite Musk’s conciliatory statement, the fallout from this political and personal clash between the President and the world’s richest man remains uncertain.In a surprising turn, Elon Musk on Wednesday expressed regret over his recent social media outbursts targeting U.S. President Donald Trump, admitting that his posts “went too far.” In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Musk wrote, “I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far.” The apology comes after a week-long public spat between the tech billionaire and the President, which captured massive attention online. The conflict began when Musk heavily criticized Trump’s sweeping tax and spending proposal—dubbed the “One Big Beautiful Bill” (OBBB)—calling it a “disgusting abomination” that would saddle Americans with unsustainable debt, potentially adding $3 trillion to the national deficit. Musk, who had previously endorsed Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign and reportedly spent $288 million in support, also appeared alongside the President at several campaign events. Trump, in turn, named Musk to lead a task force aimed at downsizing the federal workforce and slashing government spending. However, tensions flared after Musk stepped down from his advisory role and openly denounced the OBBB. Trump retaliated, claiming, “Elon was wearing thin. I asked him to leave […] and he just went CRAZY!” The feud escalated when Musk called for Trump’s impeachment and tweeted unverified allegations linking Trump to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal—posts that he has since deleted. While Musk’s deletion of several inflammatory tweets suggested an attempt to de-escalate the situation, Trump showed no sign of backing down. Posting on Truth Social, Trump warned Musk of “very serious consequences” if he chose to support Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections. Trump also took aim at Musk’s businesses, threatening to cut off federal subsidies and contracts. “The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,” Trump wrote. “I was always surprised that Biden didn’t do it.” Despite Musk’s conciliatory statement, the fallout from this political and personal clash between the President and the world’s richest man remains uncertain.

Read More
Editor07 mins

NASA: Asteroid 2024 YR4 Could Hit the Moon in 2032, Not Earth

NASA has confirmed that asteroid 2024 YR4, which sparked concern in late 2024 over a potential Earth impact, is now being monitored for a possible collision with the Moon in 2032. While the odds remain low, the asteroid’s probability of impacting the Moon has increased slightly from 3.8% to 4.3%, based on refined trajectory data. 🪨 What Is Asteroid 2024 YR4? 📅 Potential Moon Impact: December 22, 2032 Using data from JWST, scientists at NASA’s Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS) have narrowed down the asteroid’s orbit with 20% greater precision. The projected flyby date of December 22, 2032, carries a slim chance of the asteroid striking the Moon — but no threat to Earth is currently predicted. NASA emphasized that: “Even if an impact occurs, it would not affect the Moon’s orbit or pose a threat to Earth.” 🔭 Astronomers Weigh In Pawan Kumar, an astronomer and former researcher at the Indian Institute of Astrophysics, echoed NASA’s calm assessment: “The Moon is safe. Even if there’s a collision, the debris would pose no threat to Earth. Any fragments reaching near-Earth space would disintegrate in our atmosphere.” 🌍 Was 2024 YR4 Ever a Threat to Earth? Yes — briefly. In late 2024, there were early concerns that YR4 might pose a small threat to Earth. But further observations ruled out any significant impact risk, shifting attention to its proximity to the Moon instead. 🔭 What Happens Next? 📷 Webb’s Historic Observation “The @ESA_Webb space telescope has spotted asteroid 2024 YR4!”“Webb’s observations indicate that the asteroid measures roughly 60 m across, making it the smallest object targeted by Webb to date.”— ESA Operations, April 2, 2025 This marks a milestone for the James Webb Space Telescope, showcasing its ability to detect and track even small moving objects deep in space. 🧠 Bottom Line Stay tuned — the next significant tracking update is expected closer to the mid-2030 window.

Read More
Editor04 mins
Switch Language »