PM Modi Launches ₹13,500 Crore Projects in Bihar, Flags Off Four New Trains on National Panchayati Raj Day

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, during his visit to Bihar on Thursday, launched and inaugurated development projects worth approximately ₹13,500 crore. The event was marked by the inauguration of vital infrastructure projects and the launch of new train services aimed at enhancing connectivity and boosting regional development. Among the key highlights was the flagging off of four new trains: Marking the occasion of National Panchayati Raj Day, the Prime Minister also inaugurated crucial rail infrastructure projects including: In a push towards energy and infrastructure growth, PM Modi laid the foundation stone for an LPG bottling plant with a rail unloading facility at Hathua in Gopalganj district. With an investment of around ₹340 crore, the plant is expected to enhance the efficiency of bulk LPG transportation and streamline supply chains in the region. The power sector also received a significant boost as the PM laid foundation stones for projects worth over ₹1,170 crore and inaugurated multiple projects exceeding ₹5,030 crore under the Revamped Distribution Sector Scheme in Bihar. Furthering rural empowerment, PM Modi distributed benefits worth around ₹930 crore under the Community Investment Fund to more than 2 lakh Self Help Groups (SHGs) in Bihar as part of the Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana – National Rural Livelihoods Mission (DAY-NRLM). Additionally, he handed over sanction letters to 15 lakh new beneficiaries under the PMAY-Gramin scheme and released instalments to 10 lakh PMAY-G beneficiaries across the country. He also conducted Grih Pravesh (house-warming) for 1 lakh PMAY-G and 54,000 PMAY-Urban houses in Bihar by handing over keys to selected beneficiaries. The visit highlighted the government’s commitment to inclusive development, infrastructure expansion, and rural empowerment in Bihar and across India.

India Suspends Indus Waters Treaty, Closes Wagah Border Following Pahalgam Terror Attack

In a strong response to the terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, that claimed 26 lives, India on Wednesday announced the immediate suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan and closure of the Wagah-Attari border crossing. The decisions were taken during a high-level Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) meeting chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri stated that the CCS condemned the attack in the strongest terms, offered condolences to the victims’ families, and reiterated India’s zero-tolerance stance on terrorism. He confirmed that the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, which allocates western rivers to Pakistan and eastern rivers to India, would be suspended until Pakistan “credibly and irrevocably” ends its support for cross-border terrorism. Though India, as the upper riparian state, cannot immediately halt water flow, the move is seen as a strategic warning. Experts say it could severely impact Pakistan, particularly its Punjab province, if the threat is carried through. In addition, India has ordered the expulsion of all Pakistani military advisors from its High Commission in New Delhi and will withdraw its own from Islamabad. All Pakistani nationals in India with SAARC visas have been given 48 hours to leave.

Twelve US States Sue Trump Administration Over Tariff Policy; California Files Separate Case

In a major legal challenge, twelve US states—including New York, Illinois, Arizona, and Oregon—have filed a federal lawsuit on April 23, contesting the tariff policies introduced by former President Donald Trump under the guise of a national emergency. The lawsuit alleges the tariffs were imposed unilaterally and illegally, without Congressional approval, under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), 1977. ⚖️ Key Points from the Lawsuit: “By claiming authority to impose immense and ever-changing tariffs… the President has upended the Constitutional order and brought **chaos to the American economy,” the complaint reads. The legal action comes in the wake of Trump’s declaration on April 2, where he announced reciprocal tariffs against multiple nations, arguing that the U.S. should match tariffs other countries place on American goods. 🌐 States Involved: 🇺🇸 Separate Lawsuit from California In parallel, California Governor Gavin Newsom has filed a separate lawsuit in the US District Court for Northern California, claiming the tariffs would cause billions in losses for California—the largest importing state in the country. Arizona AG Kris Mayes slammed the policy as “insane,” calling it “economically reckless and illegal.” 🏛️ White House Responds White House spokesperson Kush Desai defended the administration’s stance, stating: “The Trump administration remains committed to addressing this national emergency… with every tool at our disposal, from tariffs to negotiations.” The lawsuits mark a significant legal test for the limits of executive authority in trade policy and could have far-reaching implications for U.S. economic governance and international trade relations.

Mehbooba Mufti Voices Concern Over Erosion of Institutions, Supports Rahul Gandhi’s Remarks

On Democratic Institutions & Election Commission: “What Rahul Gandhi said… needs to be investigated,” Mufti said, adding that the credibility of even the Supreme Court was being attacked. ⚖️ On Judiciary Under Fire: 🪖 On Army FIR in J&K (Rajouri Incident): 🕌 On Muslim Community & Rising Communalism: “The condition of Muslims is deteriorating. Secularism has kept us going for 77 years, but now that is under threat.”

India, US Move Closer to Trade Deal Amid Tariff Pause; Modi Hosts VP JD Vance in Delhi

India and the United States signaled significant progress in finalizing a bilateral trade agreement after Prime Minister Narendra Modi met with US Vice-President JD Vance in New Delhi on Monday night. The meeting, part of Vance’s ongoing four-day visit to India with his family, also saw discussions on deepening ties across sectors such as defence, energy, and strategic technology. “We are committed to mutually beneficial cooperation, including in trade, technology, defence, energy and people-to-people exchanges,” Modi posted on X, following their meeting. He also hosted a private dinner for Vance, his wife, and their three children at his official residence. The trade talks take place against the backdrop of a temporary 90-day pause on increased US tariffs, announced by President Donald Trump. India, which was facing proposed tariffs as high as 27% on its exports to the US, has used the window to engage in accelerated negotiations. The tariff reprieve ends on July 9, prompting urgency in finalizing a deal. While Modi and Trump have maintained a friendly personal rapport—Modi was one of the first foreign leaders to visit Trump after the start of his second term—the US president has not held back in criticizing India’s trade policies, branding the country a “tariff king” and accusing it of unfair trade practices. In a statement after Monday’s talks, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer reiterated longstanding US concerns, pointing to the “serious lack of reciprocity” in its trade relationship with India. Washington is particularly pushing for greater access to India’s protected agricultural sector, including the sale of American corn—something Indian officials are reluctant to concede due to domestic sensitivities. India has already lowered tariffs on a range of goods and is reportedly considering more reductions to advance negotiations. However, agriculture and digital trade remain key sticking points in the discussions. Beyond trade, Modi and Vance discussed broader strategic collaboration, including defence, energy security, and emerging technologies. The Indian prime minister also expressed anticipation for President Trump’s upcoming visit to India later this year, likely during the Quad summit that Delhi is set to host. The bilateral meeting concluded with delegation-level discussions and the dinner hosted by Modi, underscoring the warmth between the two countries even as complex trade issues remain under negotiation.

Delhi High Court Slams Baba Ramdev for Communal Remarks Against Hamdard, Rooh Afza

The Delhi High Court came down heavily on Patanjali founder Baba Ramdev on Tuesday for making communal remarks targeting Hamdard Laboratories and its iconic beverage, Rooh Afza. During a preliminary hearing in the case Hamdard National Foundation India v. Patanjali Foods Limited & Anr, Justice Amit Bansal expressed shock at the comments, warning that a strong judicial order may follow. “It shocks the conscience of the court. Indefensible,” Justice Bansal remarked, directing Ramdev’s legal counsel to seek instructions and ensure his presence in court. The controversy stems from a video circulated on April 3, in which Ramdev, while promoting Patanjali’s “Gulab Sharbat,” made derogatory remarks about Rooh Afza. In the video, he alleged that Hamdard was channeling profits into building masjids and madrasas, and used the provocative term “sharbat jihad.” Congress leader Digvijaya Singh subsequently filed a police complaint against Ramdev in Bhopal, accusing him of inciting communal hatred. Despite the backlash, Ramdev claimed he had not mentioned any specific brand by name. Representing Hamdard in court, Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi argued that Ramdev’s actions went far beyond product disparagement and constituted hate speech. “This is shocking. It’s about creating a communal divide. The law of defamation cannot protect such conduct,” he stated. Rohatgi urged the court to take immediate action, stressing that such content “should not be allowed even for a moment” given the volatile social climate in the country. He also informed the court that Ramdev had similarly targeted the company Himalaya, allegedly because it is also Muslim-owned. Highlighting Ramdev’s prior controversies—including a Supreme Court censure over his comments on allopathy—Rohatgi added, “A hard hand is required to nip this in the bud.” The legal team for Hamdard included Senior Advocates Mukul Rohatgi and Sandeep Sethi, supported by a team of advocates including Pravin Anand, Dhruv Anand, Nikhil Rohatgi, Udita Patro, and others. The case is expected to continue with heightened scrutiny, as the court considers whether Ramdev’s remarks amount to actionable hate speech.

Maharashtra Govt Defends Move to Make Hindi Mandatory as Third Language in State Schools Under NEP 2020

Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis on Saturday addressed growing criticism over the state’s decision to make Hindi a compulsory third language in state board schools from Class 1 onward, in alignment with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. Key Highlights of the Decision: CM Fadnavis’ Statement: Fadnavis clarified that Marathi remains compulsory and non-negotiable, asserting: “Marathi language is compulsory in Maharashtra; everyone should learn it. Additionally, if you wish to learn other languages, you can do so. Opposition to Hindi and promotion of English is surprising. If someone opposes Marathi, then it will not be tolerated.” He stressed that the policy allows linguistic expansion, not replacement, and that students benefit from early exposure to multiple languages. Opposition’s Reaction: Congress leader Vijay Wadettiwar strongly opposed the imposition of Hindi, saying: “You can keep it optional, but you cannot impose it. At whose behest are you trying to impose this language on the state?… This third language that is being introduced should not be brought in. There should be no coercion against the rights of the Marathi people.” Wadettiwar implied that the decision might be politically motivated and urged for a voluntary model, rather than a mandate. SCERT Clarifies Educational Intent: Rahul Ashok Rekhawar, Director of SCERT Maharashtra, explained that: “The decision was taken solely with educational development in mind. Students will benefit from the addition of Hindi, and it is not a political or cultural imposition.” He emphasized that the move aims to broaden students’ language skills, improve national integration, and prepare them better for central competitive exams and interstate mobility. The development has ignited a language politics debate in Maharashtra, where linguistic identity remains a sensitive topic. As the government pushes for NEP 2020 implementation, further discussions with stakeholders may unfold in the coming days.

CBI, ED Raids Target AAP Leaders Amid Rising Political Tensions

In a development steeped in political controversy, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday conducted a raid at the residence of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Durgesh Pathak, sparking a fresh war of words between AAP and the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). AAP leaders have denounced the move as a “politically motivated” attempt to stifle the party’s growing influence. The raid, reportedly linked to an alleged violation of the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA), came just days after Durgesh Pathak was appointed as co-incharge for the Gujarat Assembly Elections 2027. Reacting swiftly, AAP’s national general secretary Sandeep Pathak posted on X (formerly Twitter): “The CBI’s raid on @AamAadmiParty leader Durgesh Pathak’s residence… sends a loud message that BJP clearly views AAP as a growing threat in Gujarat and is rattled by its rising influence.” Joining the chorus, AAP MP Sanjay Singh accused the Modi government of using central agencies as tools of political vendetta. “BJP’s dirty game starts again… As soon as @ipathak25 was made co-incharge of Gujarat, CBI was sent to threaten him,” Singh wrote on X. The controversy is compounded by another enforcement action earlier this week when the Enforcement Directorate (ED) raided the Mohali residence of AAP MLA Kulwant Singh, as part of a money laundering investigation tied to the massive ₹48,000 crore Pearl Agrotech Corporation Limited (PACL) scam. The ED team, reportedly from Delhi, searched Singh’s premises in the Janta Land Promoters Limited (JLPL) area, which is linked to his real estate business. Although Singh was not present, his family members were questioned. Sources say the raid is connected to the larger PACL Ponzi scheme, which allegedly defrauded thousands of investors under the pretext of real estate projects. Funds collected through the scam were reportedly funneled into shell companies across India. Adding further complexity, Kulwant Singh had previously been questioned by the ED in another money laundering case involving drug trafficking. These back-to-back raids on AAP leaders—at a time when the party is expanding its political footprint beyond Delhi and Punjab—have led to renewed allegations of misuse of central agencies to suppress political opponents. As the Gujarat 2027 battle heats up, the confrontation between AAP and BJP is poised to intensify, with each side accusing the other of foul play.

BJP Supporters Demand Bulldozer Action in Mumbai Amid ED Chargesheet Against Gandhis in National Herald Case

BJP supporters in Mumbai have stirred controversy by demanding “bulldozer action” against properties linked to the National Herald case. This comes in the wake of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) filing a chargesheet against senior Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi. Leading the charge was BJP leader Vishwabandhu Rai, who displayed provocative posters outside the Associated Journals Limited (AJL) building in Bandra. These posters, featuring images of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, bore the slogan “Deva Bhau, Bulldozer Chalao,” calling for the demolition of properties associated with the case. The ED submitted its chargesheet on Tuesday, naming Sonia and Rahul Gandhi as accused in the National Herald money laundering case. Other prominent Congress figures such as Sam Pitroda and Suman Dubey have also been named. The document, filed earlier in April, is currently under review by Special Judge Vishal Gogne, who is expected to decide on taking cognisance during the next hearing scheduled for April 25. The agency has already initiated proceedings to seize properties worth over ₹700 crore belonging to AJL—a company closely associated with the Gandhi family. The assets in question include high-value real estate in cities such as Delhi, Mumbai, and Lucknow, notably including the iconic Herald House located on Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg in the national capital. AJL, the publisher of the National Herald newspaper, is owned by Young Indian Private Limited, in which Sonia and Rahul Gandhi hold a combined 76% stake, making them majority shareholders. The ED has clarified that the recent developments are part of its ongoing investigation under Section 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, and relevant rules from 2013 concerning the possession of attached or frozen properties. As political tensions mount, the demand for bulldozer action signals an escalation in the BJP’s offensive, mirroring tactics employed in other states, particularly Uttar Pradesh. The situation continues to fuel political debate around alleged misuse of power and selective targeting of opposition leaders.

US-China Trade War Escalates: Tariffs Soar to 245% Amid National Security Concerns

The United States has raised tariffs on Chinese imports to a staggering 245%, citing retaliatory actions by Beijing, the White House announced on Tuesday afternoon (India time). This latest development marks a sharp escalation in the ongoing trade war between the two global economic giants, pushing the standoff further into uncertain territory. The move comes after President Donald Trump authorised a formal investigation into the national security risks associated with the United States’ dependence on imported, processed critical minerals and related products. These include essential resources like cobalt, lithium, nickel, and rare-earth elements — materials that are vital for manufacturing smartphones, electric vehicle batteries, and military equipment. The White House noted that over-reliance on foreign sources for such minerals leaves the US vulnerable to “serious, sustained, and long-term supply chain shocks.” It warned that this dependence could potentially endanger national security, hinder technological advancement, and undermine economic stability. Previously, the tit-for-tat tariff exchanges had seen the US imposing a 145% tax on Chinese imports, with China retaliating with a 125% tariff on American goods. In addition, China banned the export of key materials used by aerospace manufacturers and military contractors in the US. Despite these economic headwinds, a senior Chinese official on Wednesday admitted that the American tariffs were exerting pressure. However, China reported a stronger-than-expected economic performance, with its economy growing by 5.4% in the first quarter. Industrial output rose by 6.5% and retail sales by 4.6% year-on-year. Even so, Beijing acknowledged that the global economic outlook is becoming increasingly “complex and severe,” necessitating fresh efforts to drive growth and boost consumption. President Trump, meanwhile, has made it clear that the next move is up to China. “The ball is in China’s court. China needs to make a deal with us. We don’t have to make a deal with them,” he said, just a day after accusing Beijing of reneging on a significant Boeing agreement. Trump has long claimed that countries like China, India, and Brazil impose higher tariffs on American imports than the US does on goods from those nations. He has advocated for reciprocal tariffs as a way to either force foreign governments to lower their trade barriers or stimulate domestic manufacturing, thereby creating local jobs—a key plank of his re-election campaign. Since January, the Trump administration has steadily increased tariffs on Chinese goods, starting with 10% hikes in February and March and culminating in a 34% spike in April. By April 9, the cumulative tariffs exceeded 100%, causing global financial markets, including in the US, to tumble. While Trump has paused some tariff orders, those affecting China remain firmly in place. In retaliation, China suspended imports of American sorghum, poultry, and bonemeal, imposed trade restrictions on 27 US firms, and filed a formal complaint with the World Trade Organization. Beijing has also intensified diplomatic outreach to other global players like India and the European Union, seeking to counterbalance US influence. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi recently urged New Delhi and Beijing to “make the elephant and dragon dance” and jointly oppose “hegemonism and power politics.” As the trade tensions deepen, the path forward remains uncertain, with significant implications for global trade, geopolitics, and economic stability.

Switch Language »